CLASP, the Center for American Progress, the National Women’s Law Center, and the National Association for the Education of Young Children submitted a sign-on letter opposing the Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS) proposed Head Start rule titled, “Restoring Flexibility to Support Head Start Program Access.” The letter was signed by 120 national, state, and local organizations urging HHS to rescind the proposed rule and defend the current regulations that would increase Head Start workforce compensation and benefits to reflect the value of their essential work.
This statement can be attributed to Wendy Chun-Hoon, president and executive director of the Center for Law and Social Policy (CLASP).
Washington, D.C., June 10, 2026 – CLASP denounces the passage of a budget reconciliation bill that will cause immeasurable harm to families across the country. Congress’ decision to pass legislation giving an additional $70 billion to ICE and Customs and Border Protection (CBP), on top of the billions they already received last summer, flies in the face of the policies people need to thrive. Families are struggling to make ends meet as a direct result of policy choices by Congress and the Trump Administration. One of those decisions, the Budget Reconciliation Act of 2025, gutted food assistance and health care and has contributed to over three million people no longer receiving SNAP and a 20 percent enrollment decrease in ACA health care coverage.
Adding billions more to ICE and CBP’s budgets harms children and communities and does not increase safety. It is an irresponsible use of resources consistent with the administration’s terror campaign against immigrants, families, and cities. Since January 20, 2025, ICE and CBP have perpetrated egregious sexual violence against vulnerable communities, militarized communities, and violated their own policies around safeguarding the well-being of children. This has resulted in an estimated 145,000 children in the U.S. experiencing a parent getting detained in immigration facility; at least 79 children harmed by tear gas or pepper spray; and over 6,200 kids placed in immigrant detention camps. CLASP’s reports, which cover findings from conversations with early care and education providers and parents of young children in seven states, make it clear how immigration enforcement is traumatizing children, burdening child care and early education providers, and creating social, emotional, and economic shockwaves in communities throughout the United States. This funding will only continue to separate families and traumatize all children and their communities, regardless of their immigration status.
Funding for immigration practices that separate families and harm children is not what people want or need, now or ever. CLASP will continue to work toward a country where children have the opportunities to thrive with their loving caregivers and a government that invests in what families and communities need instead of tearing them apart.
On May 20th, Suma Setty presented on the Documenting the Impact reports to the Chicago Dual Language Learners Coalition.
On May 28th, Suma Setty presented alongside Tiffany Chang at Protecting Immigrant Families on the impacts of immigration policies on children to the Prevent Child Abuse AZ Coalition.
By Teon Hayes
New brief from CLASP argues that allowing SNAP participants to buy rotisserie chicken is a helpful but a far too limited reform. SNAP’s ban on most hot or prepared foods does not reflect the realities of many families, workers, older adults, disabled people, or people without reliable kitchens. Congress should remove the hot foods ban more broadly and modernize SNAP around dignity, choice, and access.
Food flexibility will mean little if paired with benefit cuts, work requirements, or added barriers. Real reform should expand access, protect eligibility, and trust people to choose the food that meets their needs.
Washington, D.C., May 11, 2026 — Today the Administration for Children and Families (ACF) published its anticipated final rule for the Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF), which rescinds the 2024 final rule. This includes removing requirements to:
In response to this final rule, the Center for Law and Social Policy (CLASP)’s Executive Director, Wendy Chun-Hoon, issued the following statement:
“CLASP opposed these recissions in our comment submitted in February, and we remain firm in our opposition today. As so many families across the country grapple with the affordability crisis, rolling back the 2024 provisions will only weaken the child care sector, make it more difficult for committed educators to remain in the field, and make child care more expensive for families.
At a moment when the child care sector is significantly challenged and under-resourced and families are struggling to find and afford care, we need real investments and real solutions that will lift people up and meet their needs—not tear them down and make what is hard even harder. We need significant investments in child care and policies that recognize and support the value of children, families, and child care providers.
This final rule enacts policies that will further destabilize an already fragile child care system, jeopardizing both families and providers. This is not what our nation needs. Instead, we need robust federal investments in a child care system that values and pays providers well and makes access to care simple for families—along with states that center the needs of children, families, and providers in decision-making.”
By Shira Small, Stephanie Schmit, and Rachel Wilensky
As Congress negotiates the fiscal year (FY) 2027 appropriations package, CLASP is calling to double the discretionary funding for the Child Care and Development Block Grant (CCDBG), which provides child care assistance for families with low incomes and increases the quality of child care for all families. Only 15 percent of eligible children had access to child care assistance through CCDBG and other federal sources in 2021, the most recent year with available data. Increasing the total discretionary funding to $17.66 billion would expand subsidy access to more than 870,000 additional children, based on CLASP analysis. This added funding would be crucial to better reach and support families with low incomes, who have never been able to fully utilize the program as the result of decades of insufficient funding.
In addition to limiting access for eligible families not yet accessing the program, years of inadequate and stagnant funding for CCDBG mean that children currently accessing the program are at risk of losing assistance due to increasing costs. Recent actions by the administration to freeze or delay funding for child care, paired with limited increases in funding and the expiration of child care COVID relief resources, have only undermined the child care and early education sector further. These actions include:
As Congress engages in the FY27 appropriations process, it is essential that they protect programs families rely on and fight for investments that align with need, like urgent investments in child care. Concerns about economic stability, rising inflation, and attacks from the Trump Administration make sustained increases in annual discretionary funding a necessary support. The table below estimates the total per-state allocation from doubling current CCDBG funding and how many more children would be able to access care with the increased funds.
| State | Estimated Distribution of FY27 Discretionary Funds1 |
Increase from FY262 | Estimated Number of Additional Children Served3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | $345,755,460 | $172,877,730 | 30,119 |
| Alaska | $31,007,054 | $15,503,527 | 783 |
| Arizona | $362,411,194 | $181,205,597 | 15,632 |
| Arkansas | $204,344,309 | $102,172,155 | 18,503 |
| California | $1,489,353,960 | $744,676,980 | 98,364 |
| Colorado | $185,114,861 | $92,557,430 | 7,025 |
| Connecticut | $128,091,605 | $64,045,803 | 5,393 |
| Delaware | $47,644,877 | $23,822,438 | 2,810 |
| District of Columbia | $27,078,236 | $13,539,118 | 380 |
| Florida | $1,075,605,689 | $537,802,845 | 57,091 |
| Georgia | $674,352,288 | $337,176,144 | 43,298 |
| Hawaii | $58,209,921 | $29,104,960 | 2,395 |
| Idaho | $90,614,071 | $45,307,035 | 4,801 |
| Illinois | $540,930,451 | $270,465,225 | 30,763 |
| Indiana | $400,620,552 | $200,310,276 | 15,646 |
| Iowa | $170,771,836 | $85,385,918 | 8,785 |
| Kansas | $157,872,320 | $78,936,160 | 10,356 |
| Kentucky | $347,840,377 | $173,920,188 | 19,644 |
| Louisiana | $336,421,311 | $168,210,656 | 20,063 |
| Maine | $47,325,277 | $23,662,638 | 2,607 |
| Maryland | $246,018,514 | $123,009,257 | 7,251 |
| Massachusetts | $236,125,748 | $118,062,874 | 7,262 |
| Michigan | $515,047,681 | $257,523,841 | 20,668 |
| Minnesota | $240,965,053 | $120,482,527 | 14,231 |
| Mississippi | $219,723,634 | $109,861,817 | 20,397 |
| Missouri | $307,654,705 | $153,827,353 | 22,174 |
| Montana | $44,763,145 | $22,381,572 | 1,334 |
| Nebraska | $108,255,348 | $54,127,674 | 4,773 |
| Nevada | $150,008,726 | $75,004,363 | 8,245 |
| New Hampshire | $32,622,195 | $16,311,097 | 1,153 |
| New Jersey | $325,906,436 | $162,953,218 | 10,738 |
| New Mexico | $130,454,570 | $65,227,285 | 5,107 |
| New York | $818,472,897 | $409,236,449 | 26,283 |
| North Carolina | $563,002,645 | $281,501,322 | 22,639 |
| North Dakota | $32,433,000 | $16,216,500 | 1,601 |
| Ohio | $566,420,167 | $283,210,084 | 29,689 |
| Oklahoma | $247,895,404 | $123,947,702 | 14,732 |
| Oregon | $157,701,655 | $78,850,827 | 7,836 |
| Pennsylvania | $548,535,469 | $274,267,735 | 39,180 |
| Rhode Island | $39,819,727 | $19,909,864 | 1,842 |
| South Carolina | $320,099,237 | $160,049,619 | 15,318 |
| South Dakota | $40,374,495 | $20,187,247 | 2,302 |
| Tennessee | $385,846,394 | $192,923,197 | 11,391 |
| Texas | $1,991,851,022 | $995,925,511 | 122,733 |
| Utah | $169,204,127 | $84,602,064 | 7,044 |
| Vermont | $20,425,832 | $10,212,916 | 539 |
| Virginia | $379,369,792 | $189,684,896 | 22,378 |
| Washington | $268,080,745 | $134,040,373 | 6,746 |
| West Virginia | $113,577,418 | $56,788,709 | 11,571 |
| Wisconsin | $254,536,103 | $127,268,052 | 7,791 |
| Wyoming | $19,247,898 | $9,623,949 | 1,066 |
| Total | $17,662,774,0004 | $8,831,387,0005 | 870,4736 |
Suma Setty and Kaelin Rapport appeared on MomsRising’s Breaking Through Podcast to discuss their new reports documenting the effects of immigration policy and enforcement on children in immigrant families and the care providers who support them.
The Power of Age-Appropriate Sex Ed, Immigration Policies and Our Children, Maternal Mental Health Month, & MomsRising Mother’s Day Actions in DC
By Wendy Cervantes
For over a decade, ICE’s parental interest directive has served as an important tool to ensure that parents impacted by ICE enforcement actions are able to make decisions about their children’s care. First implemented following significant advocacy from racial justice, children, and immigrant rights groups in 2013, the policy is intended to ensure that ICE’s enforcement actions do not unnecessarily infringe upon the legal parental or guardianship rights of individuals facing detention and deportation. In July 2025, Trump’s ICE issued a new “detained parent directive,” replacing the policy with similar but ultimately weaker protections for families.
In response to Trump’s weakening of parental protections, Congress must act to protect children and mitigate the harms of interior enforcement. The HELP Separated Children Act would help do that.
MEDIA CONTACTS:
Melissa Stek, Communications Consultant, melissa@mountgem.com
Tom Salyers, Director of Communications, tsalyers@clasp.org
Washington, D.C., April 16, 2026—Today, directly impacted educators and lead researchers released two new reports authored by the Center for Law and Social Policy (CLASP) highlighting the impacts of the Trump Administration’s 2025 immigration policies on young children and early care and education providers in Colorado, Georgia, Illinois, Michigan, New Jersey, Texas, and Washington. The research reveals profound threats to children’s development and well-being, the mental health of caregivers, and the child care and early education industry.
Suma Setty, Senior Policy Analyst, CLASP: “We met over 100 people across the country who are experiencing the cruelty of harsh immigration policies. It is clear that these policies, along with attacks on early care and education programs, are tearing families apart and weakening our systems of support for all families with young children. Babies and toddlers have no concept of their parents’ immigration status, and yet it is being used to rob them of what they need to thrive. All children deserve the protection of adults, to live and grow in safety with their loving caregivers without fear. Policymakers have an opportunity to intervene and limit immigration enforcement’s harm on children and strengthen the tenuous scaffolding that keeps families with young children engaged in our society. Intervening now will have cascading benefits throughout the lives of young children and for our nation’s future.”
Kaelin Rapport, Ph.D., Policy Analyst, CLASP: “Immigrant communities and the early educators and caregivers who support them are struggling immensely. Current immigration policies and enforcement practices are leaving parents, providers, and children stressed, traumatized, and sometimes too afraid to leave the house—even to get basic necessities. Workplaces are being raided, people are being stopped in the street for speaking languages other than English, and children are seeing guns drawn on their parents while they’re on the playground. No child should have to worry about whether their parent will make it home from work or running errands. Caregivers and early educators should not have to worry about their own safety while preparing the next generation for a healthy future. Without immediate action from lawmakers to protect our children and immigrant communities, these policies will have rippling consequences that reach across American communities and national borders for generations.”
Elizabeth Gonzalez, Community Organizer, Congress of Communities in Detroit, MI: “Increased immigration operations have brought nothing but fear and harm to children, families, and care providers in Southwest Detroit. As director of Informal Childcaregivers Cohort, I’ve had to educate immigrant child care providers on their rights and how to remain calm if they encounter immigration agents. Over the past year, we’ve seen significant drops in enrollment in our programs and Head Start because families are scared. My own grandson now worries that his loved ones will be taken after his classmate’s parent was taken by ICE. When he sees a law enforcement officer, he asks, ‘is that a good guy or a bad guy?’ and I’ve honestly had to tell him that I don’t know. With our communities under attack, this country no longer feels like the United States of America—we’re just states. But to assure our children and staff at our centers, we say, ‘estamos unidos para proteger a nuestros niños,’ or ‘we are united to protect our children.’ We call on our elected leaders to unite with us to protect our early educators and the children in their care.”
Leah Cates, Executive Director, Second Street Youth Center in Plainfield, NJ: “Immigration enforcement doesn’t just stay out in the streets, it walks into our children’s classrooms. The impacts of this show up in children’s behavior, in their fear, and in their silence. We’re seeing increased anxiety, withdrawal, aggression, difficulty focusing, and developmental regression. Early childhood centers like ours have become more than just places of education. We have become safe havens, emotional support systems, and stabilizing forces. We are doing everything we can to ensure our families know that they can trust us and that they and their children are safe here. We are creating trauma-informed classrooms, providing Know Your Rights workshops, supporting families, and reassuring children they are safe, all while working to educate the youngest minds. But trust is always fragile when fear is constant. We cannot separate immigration policy from childhood development. Our lawmakers must take action now to enact policies that protect all children.”
Wendy Cervantes, Director of Immigration and Immigrant Families at CLASP and Director of the Children Thrive Action Network (CTAN): “The reports released today build off the research that CLASP published in 2018 and demonstrate how the Trump Administration’s immigration policies are once again undermining the well-being of our children and those who care for them. But this time, the scope of the harm is unlike anything we have ever seen, largely due to the historic increases in ICE funding to double down on detention and deportation, and the onslaught of policies to deny immigrant families the ability to meet their basic needs. Anti-immigrant policies that threaten our nation’s early educators, including the nearly 20 percent who are immigrants, further weaken the early care and education infrastructure that the administration has also attacked. Our policymakers must do everything in their power to halt the anti-child attacks, implement policies that will repair the harm, and protect the well-being of the youngest among us.”
Background: For this qualitative research project, the CLASP team conducted focus groups between June and December 2025 with 56 at-risk immigrant parents and family caregivers of 74 children ages six and under, and interviews with 67 early educators and child care providers, WIC staff, home visitors, health care workers, and community advocates in Colorado, Georgia, Illinois, Michigan, New Jersey, Texas, and Washington.
###
The Center for Law and Social Policy (CLASP) is a national, nonpartisan, anti-poverty organization advancing policy solutions for people with low incomes, with a focus on addressing systemic racism as the primary cause of poverty for communities of color.
The Children Thrive Action Network (CTAN) is a national network of children’s advocacy organizations and service providers committed to protecting and defending children in immigrant families, guided by policy principles to ensure that immigration policies safeguard children’s health, safety, and well-being. Since 2020, CTAN has urged federal and state officials to advance the “best interest of the child” in all policies and to reject policies that put children in harm’s way and undermine their safety.