The highly effective federal/state child support program secures billions in owed child support to custodial parents every year. Child support reduces child poverty and is the backbone of many poor families' budgets. We advocate for adequate funding for the child support program and for policies that ensure collected resources go to custodial parents.
States Should Distribute More Owed Child Support to Parents
By Josh Bone
More states should take advantage of a provision in federal law that allows them to distribute more owed child support payments directly to custodial parents. Such a move could help more low-income families become self sufficient and would provide much-needed income to families in this tough economic climate.
Currently, most states retain child support payments owed to parents receiving Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) benefits. The federal and state governments then split these child support payments based on the state's Medicaid matching rate. This policy was put in place to reimburse government spending on TANF. However, one of the changes in the law in early 2006 allows states to pay, or "pass through," a portion of child support revenues directly to TANF recipients without the federal government taking any share of the "passed through" revenue, as long as these payments are not counted or "disregarded" when calculating TANF benefits..
West Virginia, Washington, and Pennsylvania, among others, have taken advantage of this flexibility. Most notably, West Virginia recently began "passing through" all child support payments to custodial parents. The approximately 18,000 affected families in West Virginia will receive as much $85 million in currently outstanding child support payments. In Washington, about 12,400 families received $12.5 million between August 1, 2008 and October 31, 2009. Pennsylvania has "passed through" an additional $16 million. Low-income families in all of these states now have more money to spend, a crucial boost in the current economic climate.
The long-term benefits of such policies are also significant. The Office of Management and Budget projects such policies might save as much as $4.9 billion over 10 years, since families that receive increased child support payments will be less dependent on transfer programs. Additionally, when payments go directly to families, fathers are more likely to pay child support and work in the legal economy. While budget problems are making many states skittish about increasing pass-throughs, it is critical that these states keep in mind the potential short- and long-term benefits of West Virginia's approach.
- Michelle Vinson and Vicki Turetsky | Jun 12, 2009 State Child Support Pass-Through Policies
- Feb 13, 2009 How Much Restored Child Support Funding Will States Receive Under the Recovery Act
- Vicki Turetsky | Jul 09, 2008 The Responsible Fatherhood and Healthy Families Act of 2007
- Vicki Turetsky | Aug 10, 2009 Debtors' Prison--Prisoners' Accumulation of Debt as a Barrier to Reentry
- Vicki Turetsky | Mar 01, 2007 Staying in Jobs and Out of the Underground
- CLASP | Feb 17, 2011 Two Years Later: Impacts of Select ARRA Programs for Low-Income Workers & Families
- CLASP | Jan 25, 2010 Federal Policy Recommendations for 2010
- CLASP | Sep 01, 2009 Federal Policy Recommendations for 2009 and Beyond
- Michelle Vinson and Vicki Turetsky | Jun 12, 2009 State Child Support Pass-Through Policies
- Vicki Turetsky | Feb 13, 2009 How Much Restored Child Support Funding Will Each State Receive Under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act?



