![]() |
||||
Download the PDF Version |
||||
|
Family Child Care Ratios and Group Sizes: Charting Progress for Babies in Child Care Research-Based Rationale August 2008 by Rachel Schumacher and Elizabeth Hoffmann*
Recommendation #7 Ensure babies and toddlers in family child care are in small groups with sufficient numbers of providers: Ensure that no more than two children under age 2 be cared for by a family child care provider at one time, and that group size not exceed six children (including all children related to the provider). Content: What does the research say about babies and toddlers and this recommendation?
Potential state policies include: What are some other recommendations that affect this issue for babies and toddlers? Online tools and resources for state policymakers:
Recommendation #7 Ensure babies and toddlers in family child care are in small groups with sufficient numbers of providers: Ensure that no more than two children under age 2 be cared for by a family child care provider at one time, and that group size not exceed six children (including all children related to the provider).
Child care providers who are attuned to each child’s unique needs and personality can support, nurture, and guide the child’s growth and development.[2] The quality of the interaction between the child and provider has been found to be related to the level of security in attachment that infants have with their family child care provider.[3] Sufficient numbers of providers are needed to ensure both the quality and safety of babies and toddlers in family child care settings. In general, numerous research studies have found links
between “structural” features of center-based child care programs that can be
regulated, such as provider-to-child ratios and group size, and provider
behavior that is more positive and sensitive to the individual children in
care.[4] Less
research exists specific to family child care, but some studies have found a
connection between provider sensitivity and ratio and group size regulations
that take into account the age of children.[5] Another
study found that family child care homes that were rated as lower quality also tended
to have greater proportions of infants and toddlers in care.[6]
Additionally, when family child care homes are observed as rating higher on
standardized measures of quality, the children in care are more likely to be
assessed more positively on cognitive, language, behavior and cooperation
measures, such as the Family Day Care Rating Scale (FDCRS).[7] The National Life Safety Code, developed by the National
Fire Protection Association, recommends that child care group sizes in a home
be no larger than six, with no more than two persons “incapable of self
preservation” in the event of a need to evacuate.[8] Two
nationally recognized leaders in developing child care policy have adopted
similar standards: the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) and the U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services, Office of Head Start. First, regulations governing the family child
care homes allowed to participate in the child care system managed by the DoD require that in mixed-age family child care groups, the
number of children under two years of age is limited to two children, with no
more than six children total in care, including the provider’s own children
under age eight.[9]
The DoD’s system of child
care, including the provisions to regulate family child care providers, has
been recognized as a model of using standards and monitoring to improve quality
of care.[10] Second,
the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Head Start,
requires that small family child care homes do not exceed a group size of six
children with no more than two children under age 2, in regulations approved in
January 2008 on family child care homes providing Head Start and Early Head
Start services.[11]
Of those states that regulate the ratio of providers to children in family child care, 13 states already require no more than two children under age 2 per provider. Maximum group size for one family child care provider is harder to categorize, since many states have a matrix in which group size depends on the ages of all the children in a provider’s care. Thirteen states either cap maximum group size at six or do so if children under age 3 are present. Two states go further to limit group size to five when any children under age 2 are in care (with a maximum of two children under age 2 allowed).[12] States should pair licensing mandates with incentives and
supportive strategies in their Quality Rating and Improvement Systems (QRIS) and child care subsidy systems to ensure family child
care providers have the financial resources to afford caring for limited
numbers of infants and toddlers in small group sizes, a potential reduction in
the number of children in their care, without having to close for financial
reasons.
Acknowledgments This work is supported by the Birth to Five Policy Alliance, the Irving
Harris Foundation, the John D. & Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, and an
Anonymous Donor. We also wish to thank our reviewers for their comments and input. While
we are grateful to the contributions of our reviewers, the authors are solely
responsible for the content. Copyright © 2008 by the Center for Law and
Social Policy. All rights
reserved. * The authors would like to thank Suzanne Williamson and the Board of the National Association for Family Child Care for their input and comments on drafts of this research-based rationale. [1] National Association for Family Child Care, Quality Standards for NAFCC Accreditation, Fourth Edition, 2005, http://www.nafcc.org/documents/QualStd.pdf. [2] Young Children Develop in an Environment of Relationships, National Scientific Council on the Developing Child, 2004, http://www.developingchild.net/pubs/wp/Young_Children_Environment_Relationships.pdf. [3] James Elicker, Cheryl Ann Fortner-Wood, and Illene
C. Nopp, “The Context of Infant Attachment in Family Child
Care,” Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology
20, no. 2 (1999): 319–336. [4] NICHD Early Child Care Research Network, “Characteristics of Infant Child Care: Factors Contributing to Positive Caregiving,” Early Childhood Research Quarterly 11, no. 3 (1996): 269-306. [5] K. Allison
Clarke-Stewart, Deborah L. Vandell, Margaret Burchinal, Marion O’Brien, and Kathleen McCartney, “Do Regulable Features of Child-Care Homes Affect Children’s Development?”
Early Childhood Research Quarterly
17, no. 1 (2002): 52-86. [6] Margaret Burchinal, Carollee Howes, and Susan Kontos, “Structural Predictors of Child Care Quality In Child Care Homes,” Early Childhood Research Quarterly 17, no. 1 (2002): 87-105. [7] Clarke-Stewart, Vandell, Burchinal, O’Brien, and McCartney, “Do Regulable Features of Child Care Homes.” [8] National Fire Protection Association, Life Safety Code, 2006 Edition, http://www.nfpa.org/freecodes/free_access_document.asp?id=10106. [9] “Enclosure 8: Department of Defense Family Child Care Standards, Operational Standard 8,” in Department of Defense Instruction Number 6060.2, Child Development Programs, 1998, 38, http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/606002p.pdf. [10] Gail L. Zellman and Anne Johansen, Examining the Implementation and Outcomes of the Military Child Care Act of 1989, RAND National Defense Research Institute, 1998, http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR665/MR665.ch13.pdf. [11] The regulations also provide that among those family child care homes allowed to deliver Early Head Start services one provider may care for up to four infants and toddlers, with no more than two children under 18 months; and additional assistance or smaller group size may be necessary when serving special needs children. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, 45CFR Parts 1304 and 1306, Final Rule. Federal Register: January 8, 2008 (Vol. 73, No. 5): 1285-1297. [12] National Child Care Information and Technical Assistance Center, Definition of Licensed Family Child Care Homes, 2007, http://nccic.acf.hhs.gov/pubs/cclicensingreq/definition-fcc.html. |
||||
| All content © 2008, Center for Law and Social Policy, All Rights Reserved. |