In Focus: Pathways to Reconnection

Jun 5, 2017  |  PERMALINK »

Go-Throughs to Get Through: New report and infographics foreground the mental health experiences of young adults living in poverty

Young adults living in poverty face high exposure to “go throughs”: lived experiences of structural disadvantage and trauma with lasting implications for educational, economic, and other life outcomes. They frequently “get through” these challenges without formal mental health supports, relying on community-based programs and peer networks to cope with their experiences.

“Everybody Got Their Go Throughs”: Young Adults on the Frontlines of Mental Health summarizes findings from focus groups and analysis of data from the 2015 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The accompanying infographics visually represent young adults’ understanding of mental health and provide an overview of the national data included in the report.

The report’s major findings are a call to action, underlining the importance of an assets-based approach to mental health supports for youth and young adults. Such an approach recognizes and validates strengths, resilience, and young adults’ drive to fully achieve their education, employment, and life goals.

In the context of the current federal health care fight, “Everybody Got Their Go Throughs” highlights the racial and economic justice implications of the Medicaid expansion and full implementation of the mental health parity and prevention provisions of the Affordable Care Act for low-income young adults. Beyond the current political moment, the report also outlines a set of principles for framing mental health policy and practice.

Read the Report

Go-Throughs to Get Through: Mental Health Defined Infographic

Go-Throughs to Get Through: Low-income Young Adults and Mental Health Infographic 


May 25, 2017  |  PERMALINK »

Trump’s Education Budget: More Inequality, Less Access for Low-Income Students

Response to U.S. Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos Testimony to the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education

By Lauren Walizer and Kisha Bird

The U.S. Department of Education (ED)’s FY 2018 budget proposal would cut billions of dollars from programs that help low-income students succeed in secondary and postsecondary education.  Meanwhile, school choice programs would receive dramatic increases.

Since the passage of landmark civil rights and anti-poverty laws, including the Elementary and Secondary Education Act and Higher Education Act, the federal Department of Education has worked to ensure all students have access to quality education and equitable resources, regardless of income, race, ethnicity, gender, or ability.  Elementary, secondary, and postsecondary education are primarily funded by state, local, and private sources, but ED plays a critical role in enforcing civil rights, targeting resources to low-income students, and reducing opportunity gaps.

The Department’s budget would undermine this fundamental role, making deep cuts to financial aid programs that help low-income students access postsecondary education. Funding would be slashed by $5.2 billion, including $3.9 billion from the Pell Grant program. As more and more employers require education and training beyond high school, the employment landscape has become increasingly challenging for low-income students. They need postsecondary training but are increasingly less able to afford it.

In 2011-12, 57 percent of Black community college students received Pell grants; however, 82 percent had unmet financial need of $5,000 on average. Three-quarters of students from Asian, Hispanic, and Native populations also had remaining unmet need. With this budget, ED would dig a deeper hole for financially vulnerable students and subvert its responsibility to provide access to opportunity.

The $3.9 billion Pell cut was only made possible by harmful eligibility reductions passed in 2012. The budget would compound this mistake by eliminating Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants (SEOG) ($733 million), which overwhelmingly supports Pell Grant recipients, and cutting hundreds of millions of dollars from Work-Study (from $989 million to $500 million). ED claims that SEOG is not “well targeted”; however, this conflicts with the budget’s proposed reform to update the formula through which Work-Study is awarded, considering they use the same formula to distribute aid.

The budget would eliminate or drastically reduce investments that provide services to youth as well as prepare low-income students for postsecondary education.  That includes eliminating the 21st Century Community Learning Centers program. 21CCLC provides critical before-school, after-school, and summer programs for low-income children and youth. This would undercut more than one million children and their parents. The Trump Administration has claimed the program is not effective; however, there is strong evidence that quality afterschool programs help children and youth become more engaged in school, raise their academic performance, and remain safe during non-school hours. The budget would also reduce Gaining Early Awareness & Readiness for Undergrad Programs (GEAR UP) by more than a third and federal TRIO funding by 15 percent. These are critical programs that help prepare low-income youth and nontraditional students for postsecondary education and provide services to help them succeed.

The budget’s increased investments in school choice programs ignore the systemic issues facing America’s public schools. It calls for an additional $1.4 billion in school choice programs, including $1 billion for Title I, $250 million for a new private school choice program, and $168 million for charter schools. The title I funding is designed to support increased school choice options by encouraging districts to adopt a system of student-based budgeting and open enrollment.

ED’s budget proposal claims it will “place power in the hands of parents and families” by investing more in school choice programs.  However, these policies would help only a select group of students— leaving out the vast majority of low-income students who attend title I schools. Moreover, the budget would rip away postsecondary opportunities by eliminating funding that already falls short of meeting low-income students’ needs.  Families and students should not have to choose between having a safe place to learn afterschool and in the summer, a quality education, or whether they will be able to access and complete postsecondary education without crushing student loan debt.

CLASP urges Congress to reject this budget to prevent increased inequality and social immobility for low-income students.


Apr 7, 2017  |  PERMALINK »

Attorney General Review of DOJ Consent Decrees Threatens Youth of Color

By: Clarence Okoh

On Monday the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) released a memorandum from Attorney General Jeff Sessions ordering a review of the department’s use of consent decrees with cities and law enforcement agencies with documented histories of violent police misconduct. These measures are court-ordered agreements between the DOJ and law enforcement agencies to make structural reforms to local policing practices and policies to ensure the rights of all community members are respected.  The Attorney General and the Trump Administration have expressed skepticism at the value of consent decrees despite their effectiveness at surfacing “patterns or practices” of systemic rights violations and violent policing tactics used against low-income communities, communities of color, young people, and individuals with disabilities. This new effort from Attorney General Sessions is the latest in the administration’s attempts to implement a failed law and order framework for federal criminal justice and law enforcement policies. 

The high-profile police killings of young Black people—including Michael Brown in Ferguson, Freddie Gray and Korryn Gaines in Baltimore, Renisha McBride in Detroit and Laquan McDonald in Chicago—spurred a national conversation on both individual acts of police misconduct and broader, underlying implicit bias and systemic failures of the criminal justice system to protect the civil liberties and safety of communities of color. Under Attorneys General Eric Holder and Loretta Lynch in the Obama Administration, DOJ leveraged consent decrees to investigate these “patterns and practices” of police misconduct and initiate reforms that strengthened the relationship between law enforcement and the communities they serve.

Advocates for youth should be particularly distressed by this recent development. Data makes it clear that youth of color have disproportionate contact with law enforcement in nearly every measurable way despite committing crime at similar rates to their White peers. For example, Black young men are stopped by police at 2.5 times the rate of young White men, and Black young women are referred to law enforcement from school at over twice the rate of their White counterparts.  In a recent DOJ investigation, one young person in Chicago vividly describes policing as so omnipresent that his neighborhood feels like an “open air prison,” a sentiment that powerfully captures the role of many law enforcement agencies as an occupying force in communities of color. The over-criminalization of youth of color in schools and in their neighborhoods erodes trust in policing and disrupts pathways to careers, higher education, and social mobility.

Jeopardizing the role of federal oversight into abusive policing practices could further marginalize many of our most vulnerable young people and is counterproductive to the growing bipartisan consensus around the value of proven strategies like community policing in achieving safe communities.  In spite of DOJ’s irresponsible perspective, local leaders in Baltimore, including Mayor Catherine Pugh and Police Commissioner Kevin Davis, for example, remain steadfast in moving forward in the consent decree process they agreed to in January with the Obama Administration.  They understand that doing business as usual was harmful to their residents—particular to youth and young adults—and did not promote safety, accountability, or trust.

Instead of wasting limited public dollars on failed strategies, the administration should look to strategies developed by local elected officials, law enforcement, youth, and community leaders a outlined in the Report on 21st Century Policing and  in Cities United’s Strategic Resource for Mayors on Police-Involved Shootings and In-Custody Deaths. Both detail evidenced-based approaches that build trust between communities and law enforcement by creating accountability and transparency. More broadly, robust investments in youth-serving systems, including education, workforce, and health care, should be incorporated into any federal, state, or local anti-incarceration and anti-violence strategy.

Federal accountability and oversight in communities that have failed to promote fair and equitable treatment has provided a vital safety net for young people of color disproportionately victimized by law enforcement. Threatening to undo the roles of consent decrees in creating safe communities is both antithetical to the notion of police accountability, and endangers the capacity of DOJ to achieve its mission to “promote a peaceful and lawful society where the civil rights of all persons are valued and protected.” Youth of color deserve safety—not just from violent crime but from violent, abusive systems as well. 

site by Trilogy Interactive