As a nation, we say we want to keep children safe, yet the bulk of federal investment in child welfare supports children only after maltreatment has occurred and they are removed from their homes. The bulk of that funding supports room and board costs, not treatment services. Not surprisingly, far too many children are abused and neglected, and placed in foster care where they linger for long periods. We advocate for investments in a continuum of services that: (1) increase prevention and early intervention services that help keep children and families out of crisis; (2) increase specialized treatment services for children and families that experience crisis; (3) increase services to support families after a crisis has stabilized (including birth families, as well as kinship and adoptive families created when parents are unable to care for their children); (4) enhance the quality of the workforce providing services to children and families; and (5) improve accountability for dollars spent and outcomes achieved. CLASP works to identify, develop and advocate for policies that lead to such investments.
It’s Time to Realign Child Welfare Financing Structure to Support the Outcomes We Want for Children and Families
On July 29th the U.S. House Ways and Means Subcommittee on Income Security and Family Support held a hearing on how child welfare waiver demonstration projects can be used to promote child well-being. Rutledge Q. Hutson testified at that hearing arguing that reauthorizing child welfare waiver authority is insufficient to alter the outcomes for children and families in the child welfare system. Instead, Ms. Hutson argued that we need comprehensive financing reform - reform that will both infuse new resources into and redirect resources within the child welfare system to provide needed services and supports that keep children out of foster care whenever safely possible. At the conclusion of the hearing, Chairman McDermott and Ranking Member Linder expressed interest in what comprehensive financing reform would entail and requested all witnesses to provide supplemental testimony outlining their ideas for such reform. The following are excerpts from Ms. Hutson's supplemental testimony.
The vast majority of federal support for child welfare is available only after harm has occurred and children are removed from their families. The single largest federal child welfare source of funding generally cannot be used to prevent child abuse and neglect from occurring nor to intervene when it is still possible to keep a child safely at home.
While Fostering Connections took many critical steps towards improving outcomes for children who enter foster care, it did relatively little to try to prevent children from needing to enter foster care in the first place. There was broad recognition that the more difficult challenge of realigning the financing structures to prevent abuse and neglect and avoid foster care when possible remained.
CLASP believes there are three broad components of comprehensive financing reform:
- Expanding Title IV-E funds to support the full continuum of services needed by children who have experienced or are at risk of experiencing child abuse and neglect.
- Increasing support to enhance the child welfare workforce.
- Increasing accountability - both fiscal accountability and accountability for the outcomes children and families experience.
- Rutledge Hutson | Apr 07, 2011 Federal Adoption and Guardianship Assistance Under Title IV-E, FY 2009
- Rutledge Hutson | Apr 07, 2011 Federal Foster Care Assistance Under Title IV-E, FY 2009
- Rutledge Q. Hutson | Sep 03, 2010 Supplemental Testimony on Comprehensive Child Welfare Financing Reform
- Rutledge Q. Hutson | Jul 29, 2010 Testimony on How Child Welfare Waivers Can and Cannot Promote Child Well-Being
- CLASP | Jan 25, 2010 Federal Policy Recommendations for 2010