Federal TANF Policy
CLASP closely monitors regulations, guidance and legislation that affect Federal TANF policy. We advocate for policies that strengthen TANF as a part of the safety net and support improved oportunities for recipients and other low-income families. We provide policymakers and advocates at the state level with analysis of the opportunities available within the Federal policy framework.
Sep 19, 2014 | PERMALINK »
TANF Extended through Continuing Resolution
Before departing to campaign, members of Congress extended the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) block grant through December 11, 2014, as part of the continuing resolution to keep the government running. Without this legislation, TANF would have lapsed on September 30. Since 2010, TANF has been operating under a series of short-term extensions, often tied to appropriations bills.
While the TANF extension did not include any policy changes, it did include two funding cuts:
- The Contingency Fund was cut to $598 million, down from the previously authorized level of $612. In FY 2014, 20 states requested funds from the Contingency Fund. States must qualify based on high levels of unemployment or receipt of nutrition benefits, and must spend state dollars above historical levels on services for needy families.
- No money was provided for TANF-related research, which has been set at $15 million per year since TANF was created in 1996. If these funds are not restored, several major studies of employment strategies currently under way will be at risk.
There is still the possibility that these cuts could be restored when Congress returns in November and grapples with how to provide for funding for the rest of the year, either through appropriations bills or an additional continuing resolution.
In addition, before recessing, the House of Representatives passed by voice vote HR 4137, which would add stores that sell marijuana to the list of locations where states are required to prohibit TANF recipients from accessing their benefits through EBT transactions. This builds on a provision, enacted in 2012, that requires states to block recipients from withdrawing TANF benefits at liquor stores, casinos and strip clubs. There is no evidence that either provision addresses a real problem; rather, like proposals to require recipients to submit to drug tests, they are based on unfounded stereotypes about welfare recipients.
- Elizabeth Lower-Basch | May 08, 2014 CLASP Comments on TANF EBT Access Restrictions
- Elizabeth Lower-Basch, Amy Ellen Duke-Benfield and Lavanya Mohan | Mar 07, 2014 Ensuring Full Credit Under TANF's Work Participation Rate
- Elizabeth Lower-Basch | Nov 12, 2013 Comments on Proposed Revisions to TANF Financial Data Collection (ACF-196R)
- Matt Lewis, Elizabeth Kenefick, and Elizabeth Lower-Basch | Oct 11, 2013 Random Drug Testing of TANF Recipients is Costly, Ineffective and Hurts Families
- Elizabeth Lower-Basch | Oct 01, 2013 Options for Continuing TANF Benefits and Services in the Absence of an Extension of Federal Funding