Policy Areas for Action
Dec 19, 2014 | PERMALINK »
Rating Colleges, Improving Outcomes
Today, the U.S. Department of Education released a draft framework for President Obama’s proposed college ratings system, previously known as the Postsecondary Institution Ratings System (PIRS). The purpose of the ratings system is threefold: 1) to provide better information to students and families about access, affordability, and outcomes, 2) to generate reliable, useful data that policymakers and the public can use to hold institutes of higher education accountable, and 3) to help colleges and universities measure, benchmark, and better address the principles of access, affordability, and outcomes.
CLASP has made a number of recommendations to the Department over the last year, in the form of written comments, testimony, a briefing paper on implementing a system that empowers students while avoiding unintended consequences, and a briefing paper on the importance presenting workforce outcomes. We are pleased to see some of our recommendations addressed in the draft framework.
First, we are gratified that the Department plans to include workforce outcomes, like employment and earnings, in the ratings system. Students, especially low-income students, go to school to improve their earnings potential. A ratings system without workforce outcomes would be sorely insufficient. We especially applaud the Department because including workforce outcomes will be no easy task. The ratings systems will need to address a myriad of issues, including who is covered by the metric (all students or only graduates), timeframe of the measurements (e.g., one, five, or ten years out), and not creating disincentives to enroll low-income or underprepared students who may have uncertain paths to economic success.
Second, we appreciate the attention to creating fair comparison groups of institutions that take into account differences in institutional characteristics and missions. The strategy of grouping colleges and universities by predominantly two- and four-year institutions is a good start, and the framework rightly identifies additional characteristics for consideration like program mix and admissions selectivity.
One element missing from the framework, however, is disaggregating workforce outcomes by program of study. Many low-income and non-traditional students have very few institutions to choose from; they often stay close to home to live with their parents, or they have families of their own and cannot uproot to attend a far-away college. Yet, students do have the important choice of program of study, which often drives employment and earnings outcomes as much as the institution they select. Facilitating more informed choices of programs of study through better information on earnings, along with the other measures like completion, holds the promise of helping low-income, non-traditional students and their families move out of poverty.
In the coming weeks, CLASP will complete a full analysis of the Administration’s draft framework, and we look forward to working with the Department to improve the rankings system.
Learn More About the Alliance for Quality Career Pathways
- Anna Cielinski | Nov 21, 2014 Transparency and Accountability: Implementing a Postsecondary Institution Rating Systems That Empowers Students While Avoiding Unintended Consequences
- Judy Mortrude and Manuela Ekowo | Oct 22, 2014 A Coming of Age Story for Career Pathways
- Katherine Saunders | Oct 09, 2014 New Study on Postsecondary Outcomes for Returning Adult Students
- Manuela Ekowo | Oct 02, 2014 OCTAE Provides a “One-Stop” Shop for Career Pathways Resources
- Kisha Bird, Marcie Foster, and Evelyn Ganzglass | Sep 29, 2014 WIOA Creates New Opportunities to Improve Economic and Career Success for Low-Income Youth and Adults
- Tim Harmon | Dec 12, 2014 Shared Accountability in WIOA and Career Pathways
- Anna Cielinski | Dec 12, 2014 Using "Measurable Skill Gains" to Best Serve Low-Income, Lower-Skilled Individuals
- Anna Cielinski | Nov 21, 2014 Transparency and Accountability: Implementing a Postsecondary Institution Rating System That Empowers Students While Avoiding Unintended Consequences
- Nov 20, 2014 Benefits Access for College Completion: Innovative Approaches to Meet the Financial Needs of Low-Income Students
- Kisha Bird, Marcie Foster, and Evelyn Ganzglass | Sep 29, 2014 New Opportunities to Improve Economic and Career Success for Low-Income Youth and Adults: Key Provisions of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA)