CLASP works to ensure that low-income and marginalized communities have broader access to civil legal assistance by promoting policies that strengthen the Legal Services Corporation (LSC) and improve the quality of civil legal aid programs.
Jul 15, 2016 | PERMALINK »
Bills End Some Restrictions on LSC Funds
CLASP has been working since January 2007 in a coalition to eliminate language in the LSC Appropriations Act that applies multiple restrictions not just to LSC funds, but to all of the funds that LSC grantees receive, regardless of their source. Since 1996, all of LSC grantees' funds, including those from state and local governments, Interest on Lawyers Trust Account (IOLTA) programs, United Ways, private foundations, state and local bar associations, and individual and corporate donations, have been subject to the same restrictions as those that apply to funds appropriated by Congress for LSC.
These include restrictions that limit the tools that legal aid lawyers can use to fully represent their clients, including participation in class actions, seeking and receiving attorneys' fees, and legislative and administrative advocacy. They prohibit representation of many financially eligible clients, including most undocumented and many documented immigrants, prisoners, and public housing residents who are being evicted after being charged with certain drug offenses.
In April 2009, Senator Harkin introduced a bill to reauthorize the Legal Services Corporation. CLASP worked closely with Senator Harkin's staff in crafting the bill which updates the LSC Act, last amended in 1977, authorizes $750 million in funding for LSC, and eliminates most of the Appropriations Act restrictions, including the language that applies the restrictions to grantees' non-LSC funds. A companion Bill was introduced in the House in October 2009 that is very similar to the Harkin Bill. It also authorizes $750 million, but it goes somewhat further than the Harkin Bill in eliminating restrictions.
In May 2009, the President Obama's budget recommended that Congress appropriate $435 million for LSC for FY 2010, eliminate all of the restrictions on non-LSC funds, and remove the class action and attorneys' fees restriction on LSC funds. These recommendations were consistent with those made by the LSC Transition team, headed by CLASP's Executive Director, Alan Houseman.
In June 2009, the House passed the Commerce, Justice, Science and Related Agencies (CJS) Bill which included $440 million for LSC, but did not eliminate the non-LSC funds restriction. The House bill did eliminate the restriction on attorneys' fees for all LSC grantee funds. In early November 2009 the Senate adopted its version of the CJS bill that included only $400 million for LSC but eliminated all of the restrictions on non-LSC funds with the exception of the restrictions on prisoner representation and abortion. The Senate has named its conferees and we expect the House to name their conferees shortly. We are working to ensure that the conference bill includes funding at or close to the amount in the House bill and adopts the Senate position on restrictions.
- Alan Houseman & Linda Perle | Dec 03, 2013 Securing Equal Justice for All: A Brief History of Civil Legal Assistance in the U.S.
- Alan W. Houseman | Jul 01, 2009 Civil Legal Assistance in the United States: An Update for 2009
- Alan Houseman & the CLASP Staff | Oct 16, 2008 CLASP Federal Policy Recommendations for 2009 and Beyond
- Alan Houseman & Linda Perle | Sep 01, 2003 Civil Legal Aid: An Overview of the Program and Developments
- US Department of Education | Jan 26, 2017 Sensitive Locations Fact Sheet
- Alan W. Houseman and Linda E. Perle | Dec 03, 2013 Securing Equal Justice for All: A Brief History of Civil Legal Assistance in the United States
- Alan W. Houseman | Nov 26, 2013 Civil Legal Aid in the United States: An Update for 2013
- Feb 13, 2012 President Proposes to Restore Civil Legal Aid Funding, But More Is Needed
- CLASP | Jan 25, 2010 Federal Policy Recommendations for 2010